data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68c21/68c217c4000f74b87bd8dc856622465b97ed9f2a" alt=""
KELLER, Texas – The Keller ISD school board faced a packed room of parents and community members Thursday evening as it attempted to justify a controversial proposal to divide the district into two separate entities. However, many in attendance remained unconvinced by the board’s reasoning.
Key Developments from the Meeting
The meeting, which began at 5 p.m., continued late into the night as emotions ran high on both sides of the debate.
One notable absence was Superintendent Dr. Tracy Johnson, fueling speculation about her future with the district. The board was expected to discuss her possible resignation during the meeting.
More than 200 individuals signed up to speak—more than twice the number from a similar meeting held two weeks prior—highlighting the intensity of public interest in the proposed split.
A map presented by the board outlined the potential division, with Highway 377 serving as the proposed boundary.
Concerns Over Equity and Financial Burdens
Opponents of the split voiced strong objections, particularly regarding financial disparities between the two potential districts. Many fear that the less affluent side would face significant economic disadvantages, including reduced access to Keller’s established facilities and an increased share of the district’s existing debt.
“Every board member should be looking at me,” one parent said passionately. “It is absolutely unacceptable for you to exploit an ambiguous law to make a unilateral decision without a vote from the people. That is absolutely disgusting. You even heard from a sixth grader.”
Support for the Split Emerges
Despite the vocal opposition, a clear contingent of attendees supported the proposal, advocating for smaller, more localized school districts. Many of these supporters wore yellow or displayed yellow ribbons as a symbol of their stance.
“You have faced the mob, the noise, the backlash. Yet, you have stayed focused,” one supporter told the board. “Your strength, courage, and vision are not just commendable but vital. I support the split if it means better opportunities for our children.”
Interestingly, this group was notably absent from the previous meeting two weeks ago.
Superintendent’s Absence Raises Questions
Dr. Tracy Johnson’s empty chair at the meeting’s outset quickly became a topic of discussion. Her nameplate had been removed, adding to speculation about her potential departure. According to the meeting’s agenda, the board planned to name an interim superintendent.
A Broader Funding Issue
Board President Charles Randklev reiterated that the proposal to divide the district stems from broader concerns over inadequate public school funding. He defended the initiative while emphasizing that no final decisions have been made. He noted that committees have been established to assess the feasibility of a split—though these committees were previously appointed by the board itself.
As discussions continue, the fate of Keller ISD hangs in the balance, with passionate voices on both sides pushing for their vision of the district’s future.